Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Francesco Riosa <francesco@×××××××××.it>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] digest-* files in portage tree
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:28:46
Message-Id: 4242E0A1.6050809@pnpitalia.it
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] digest-* files in portage tree by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
2
3 >On Thursday 24 March 2005 09:16 am, Francesco Riosa wrote:
4 >
5 >
6 >>Chris Gianelloni ha scritto:
7 >>
8 >>
9 >>>On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 14:22 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
10 >>>
11 >>>
12 >>>>In addition to "Manifest" files in portage tree there are 19000
13 >>>>"digest-${P}" files in the portage tree each of this uses 4k on ext{2,3}
14 >>>>filesystem and has to be scanned each time rsync is run on the tree.
15 >>>>Is possible to avoid the use of theese files?
16 >>>>
17 >>>>
18 >>>Not if you ever want to ensure that what you're downloading hasn't been
19 >>>trojaned or otherwise tampered with.
20 >>>
21 >>>
22 >>ok, this is true only when you have FEATURES="strict" or "cvs" that it's
23 >>not the default.
24 >>
25 >>
26 >
27 >no it's not
28 >
29 >Manifest is checked when you have FEATURES=strict, digest is checked everytime
30 >you fetch/unpack files ... all those little 'src_uri md5' lines is a check
31 >against the digest
32 >-mike
33 >
34 >
35 ah ok, I was confused by the fact that I can change patches and ebuild
36 in my *overlays* without the need of a "ebuild P digest"
37 already found "digestCheckFiles" & "digestcheck" in portage.py so
38 pointers not needed anymore.
39
40 thanks
41 --
42 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list