Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Tue, 11 Jul 2017 01:09:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20170711020912.305039c1@snowblower | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:24:10 +0200 |
| 2 | Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > William, I'm not sure if you're aware of how package managers work but |
| 4 | > checking reverse dependencies of a package takes significant amount of |
| 5 | > time. Changing -C to do that would be a serious performance |
| 6 | > regression. Which would result in users requesting yet another option |
| 7 | > to disable this. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Eh, that's a Portage performance problem, not a package manager |
| 10 | performance problem. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |