Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh | ||
| Date: | Sat, 20 Dec 2014 20:40:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_mXDoqcR0vP4b_FT==TyWv_zKPxOpAM-_b30UNdk7sFOw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh by "Сергей" |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Сергей <protserovsd@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > I see. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo-functions/pull/2 It is my pull request. |
| 3 | > Seems like these packages' maintainers are busy solving other problems now. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | |
| 6 | If this really gets in somebody's way they will just post a notice in |
| 7 | the affected packages that on a given date they'll just patch |
| 8 | everything to use the new path. That is how half the changes around |
| 9 | here get made. If there is controversy somebody can always escalate |
| 10 | it. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Is this really the rate-limiting step to being able to run without |
| 13 | openrc installed? |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh | "Сергей" <protserovsd@×××××.com> |