1 |
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Alex Alexander <wired@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +0000, Markos Chandras wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: |
4 |
>> > On 10/30/2010 08:10 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: |
5 |
>> > > If i remember it right, the server profile was created for those people, who only want a minimum |
6 |
>> > > amount of default profile enabled USE flags (so no desktop profile because of that), but on the |
7 |
>> > > other side dont want to do the additional work/checks/reading for hardened profiles (which have much |
8 |
>> > > less profile enabled USE flags, but also have the special gcc, glibc and Kernel), basicly a profile, |
9 |
>> > > which does the same as hardened profile without the specific hardened bits. |
10 |
>> > > |
11 |
>> > > |
12 |
>> > |
13 |
>> > Isn't this essentially what the default profile is? Basically server is |
14 |
>> > just default + USE="apache2 ldap mysql snmp truetype xml". |
15 |
>> Well it shouldn't be like that. And if the default profile is pretty |
16 |
>> much the same as the server one, then please consider removing the |
17 |
>> server profile as it makes no sense then |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Please don't. The fact that there are only a few changes doesn't make it |
20 |
> useless. Also, you'd be forcing all users currently using the profile to |
21 |
> migrate without any real reason. |
22 |
|
23 |
We don't really delete profiles (maybe once every few years...) We |
24 |
could opt to mark the server target deprecated and not update it |
25 |
anymore. |
26 |
|
27 |
-A |
28 |
|
29 |
> |
30 |
> -- |
31 |
> Alex Alexander | wired |
32 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer | Council / Qt / Chromium / more |
33 |
> www.linuxized.com |
34 |
> |