Archives
Archives
| From: | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them. | ||
| Date: | Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:19:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1152526560.22145.5.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them. by Richard Fish |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 01:34 -0700, Richard Fish wrote: |
| 2 | > On 7/9/06, Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > > 2) If yes, are there any other flags that ebuilds should die on ? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > My (user) opinion is that ebuilds should not die on CFLAGS, at least |
| 6 | > not until per-package CFLAGS are implemented. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | per pkg cflags are here already it would fall under the per |
| 9 | pkg env variables. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 14 | Gentoo Linux |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them. | Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |