| 1 |
On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 13:39, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 07 November 2004 21:46, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I absolutely agree. Have a look at the number of ebuilds in net-misc, |
| 4 |
> > before caring for your ebuilds of interest, please. :| |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> net-misc is the perfect example of why additional categories are a *good* |
| 7 |
> idea. Not only is it difficult to see what's available, but places like that |
| 8 |
> simply become a huge dumping ground for unmaintained ebuilds. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Speaking of "net-misc", I think "iperf" should move out of net-misc and |
| 11 |
into net-analyzer, where it can join its cousin "netperf". |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives