1 |
On 01/30/2014 11:02 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> El jue, 30-01-2014 a las 13:47 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer escribió: |
4 |
>>> * Pacho Ramos schrieb am 29.01.14 um 07:58 Uhr: |
5 |
>>>> Currently, there is no really working version of it in the tree: |
6 |
>>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494624 |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> But due its bumps and current bugs, this needs a maintainer... |
9 |
>>>> otherwise, I would treeclean it (the problem is that looks like some |
10 |
>>>> people use it, but without none of them willing to maintain it, it will |
11 |
>>>> be difficult to handle :( ) |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> I would help taking care of it, as I use it sometimes. |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> How oftes does this need to be bumped? |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> I am not sure :(, I am not too familiar with it since it never worked ok |
22 |
>> on my machines |
23 |
>> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I do a lot of version bumping on google-chrome, and I have a script |
26 |
> that automates the process for me. If anyone is interested in |
27 |
> maintaining googleearth in a similar manner, you might find my script |
28 |
> useful. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/chrome-bump |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Googleearth is 90% of the time broken. I don't see how you can do |
34 |
automated version bumps there. And we should not bump if the new version |
35 |
is broken. |