1 |
Christian Heim a écrit : |
2 |
> Heya, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> net-wireless/ipw2100 and net-wireless/ipw2200 are both kernel drivers built as |
5 |
> an external package through portage. The codebase currently in portage is the |
6 |
> same that is present in any up-to-date kernel tarball (2.6.x). |
7 |
> |
8 |
> For this reason I am suggesting, everyone migrates to the in-kernel drivers. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> They can be found here: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Networking ---> |
13 |
> Network device support ---> |
14 |
> [*] Network device support |
15 |
> Wireless LAN (non-hamradio) ---> |
16 |
> [*] Wireless LAN drivers (non-hamradio) & Wireless Extensions |
17 |
> <M> Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Connection |
18 |
> <M> Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG and 2915ABG Network Connection |
19 |
> |
20 |
> These will also enable the in-kernel version of the ieee80211 driver. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> As per summary, both packages are going to get punted from the tree. Both will |
23 |
> vanish around sometime next January (I'd say 30 days from today - which makes |
24 |
> it 21th January 2007). |
25 |
> |
26 |
> And to leave those of you, who already use the in-kernel driver relaxed, the |
27 |
> firmware images are not going to get removed as they are still needed for the |
28 |
> in-kernel drivers. |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
On second thoughts, I'll raise a small objection to the removal. Latest |
32 |
gentoo version is 1.2.0 while the kernel (gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r2) says |
33 |
to contain 1.1.4. I know that difference isn't exactly huge, but still, |
34 |
it's a step backwards. |
35 |
|
36 |
On a side note, how do I tell the in-kernel driver where to find the |
37 |
firmware? Apparently, it's having issues loading it. |
38 |
|
39 |
As for the package, as I am myself a user of ipw2200, I could help out |
40 |
with whatever tasks are needed to maintain this package (if needed) |
41 |
|
42 |
Cheers, |
43 |
|
44 |
Rémi |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |