| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Ian Whyman <thev00d00@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Can we not just have a developer wide vote or something? This instance |
| 4 |
> clearly not going to resole itself. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I don't think the average developer is really in a good position to |
| 7 |
resolve this - it will just create a whole lot of fuss and who knows |
| 8 |
if it will come to the right resolution. If it really doesn't matter |
| 9 |
than save a lot of fuss and flip a coin. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If it does matter then the maintainers of the media-video herd should |
| 12 |
resolve this That's generally where the affected packages are, but |
| 13 |
they should of course call for comments from reverse dependencies |
| 14 |
after suitably framing the issue. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If anybody feels that isn't going anywhere or isn't going in the right |
| 17 |
direction and that something needs to change, they can always ask the |
| 18 |
council to take it up. They're not really the ideal ones to get |
| 19 |
involved and will probably want somebody to make a really good case |
| 20 |
for why they should step in. However, if there really is a need for |
| 21 |
some kind of democratic vote at least the problem becomes properly |
| 22 |
informing seven people and not 200. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Rich |
Archives