Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o>
To:
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default or not?)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:50:23
Message-Id: U1794T111E5W3.256751188GORGAI@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default or not?) by Ned Ludd
1 On 26/11/2005 13:55:25, Ned Ludd (solar@g.o) wrote:
2 > On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 19:30 +0100, Bruno wrote:
3 >
4 > > What's the advantage of splitting out the debug info to some extra
5 > > location instead of leaving it in the original binary (maybe smaller
6 > > foot-print in memory while the debugging info is not used),
7 >
8 > Yes exactly a stripped binary will occupy less space in RAM.
9
10 I may be wrong, but I don't think this is true. As I understand it,
11 debug sections aren't part of the PT_LOAD segments so the loader won't
12 load them into memory.
13
14 --
15 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default or not?) Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>