Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:45:18
Message-Id: 20130128044509.GA26718@linux1
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late) by Felix Kuperjans
1 On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:06:48PM +0100, Felix Kuperjans wrote:
2 > Mike Gilbert:
3 > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Felix Kuperjans
4 > > <felix@××××××××××××××.com> wrote:
5 > >> Samuli Suominen wrote:
6 > >>> please review this news item, seems we need one after all
7 > >> Hello Samuli,
8 > >>
9 > >> /dev/root is no longer available in this udev version, so people who put
10 > >> this in their /etc/fstab might end up with an unbootable system.
11 > >>
12 > >> I suggest including in the news item, that /dev/root must be replaced
13 > >> with the actual root device or LABEL=..., UUID=... and the like in
14 > >> /etc/fstab.
15 > >>
16 > > fstab is not consulted for mounting the root filesystem, so it doesn't
17 > > really matter what you have in there. Either the kernel mounts it
18 > > based on the kernel command line, or your initramfs mounts it based on
19 > > whatever your /init programs does.
20 > Well, *if* a line with /dev/root is present in /etc/fstab, the system
21 > does not boot up properly (tested it right now).
22 > I always though such a line in /etc/fstab is needed so that fsck is run
23 > on the root filesystem...
24
25 That was an example in the fstab in the stages, but the handbook always
26 told you to replace /dev/root with the reference to the specific root
27 device.
28
29 William