1 |
On Monday 28 December 2009 21:04:01 Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
2 |
> To me you are saying that DEPEND would work just fine. No? |
3 |
|
4 |
Setting the proto as DEPEND for the library wouldn't work because a user could |
5 |
install the library, remove every DEPEND-only package and legitimately expect |
6 |
the library to continue working, including being able to build other programs |
7 |
against it. Putting the proto in DEPEND for every package that uses the |
8 |
library isn't good because (unless the package references the proto directly) |
9 |
the fact that the proto is needed is an internal detail of the library, that |
10 |
might even change between versions, and packages using the library shouldn't |
11 |
have to know about it. |