1 |
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 07:36 -0500, Mike Doty wrote: |
2 |
> | Well, the x86 team has now chosen some leads so we can start getting |
3 |
> | everything together as a team. For our leads, we have chosen to have a |
4 |
> | "committee" of 4 of us: halcy0n, solar, azarah, and wolf32o2. We each |
5 |
> | felt that we didn't have the time or experience to be able to handle |
6 |
> | being a sole lead by ourselves. |
7 |
> | |
8 |
> | Just letting everyone know what is going on with the team. |
9 |
> | |
10 |
> | Mark |
11 |
> Can you be a bit more specific? Do each of you lead a particular part |
12 |
> of the team, or do you all lead in general. Also, who is the head(what |
13 |
> would be refered to as strategic lead)? |
14 |
|
15 |
We can't be much more specific because we haven't defined any roles. |
16 |
Essentially, we're all working collaboratively to lead the group, and |
17 |
are on a massive recruitment drive from within the dev ranks. If you |
18 |
want a point of contact, you can contact me. I'm sure we'll fragment |
19 |
off a bit into more specialized roles as we figure out what is going on |
20 |
a bit better. Basically, none of us have the time to dedicate solely to |
21 |
running the x86 team, as we all have other projects which already takes |
22 |
up a lot of our time. There is no "head" per se, but as I said, you can |
23 |
contact me if you need anything. We pretty much feel that the arch team |
24 |
doesn't need a "lead" so much, as there isn't really a "direction" to go |
25 |
in, as an arch team is all QA/security/stabilization/releng. There's |
26 |
not much "strategic" about adding a keyword to packages and doing |
27 |
testing. The goal for us right now is to bring in some AT and pull in a |
28 |
lot more developers as full arch devs, so we can fully meet the |
29 |
expectations of an arch team. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Chris Gianelloni |
33 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
34 |
x86 Architecture Team |
35 |
Games - Developer |
36 |
Gentoo Linux |