| 1 |
On 5/29/19 3:28 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Home directory ownership |
| 4 |
> ------------------------ |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> If the user in question uses a regular home directory (i.e. not |
| 7 |
> ``/dev/null``), the user package should maintain the directory |
| 8 |
> via ``keepdir`` command. This allows for clean removal of the home |
| 9 |
> directory if it is no longer needed. The package manager will also |
| 10 |
> apply correct permissions if the directory does not exist yet. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
This made complete sense when removal of the user package implied |
| 14 |
removal of the system user. It's still not a big deal, but this could |
| 15 |
delete the empty home directory of a valid (but locked) user account. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I don't feel strongly either way, just pointing it out. |
Archives