Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Wolfgang E. Sanyer" <wolfgangesanyer@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] flag-o-matic.eclass: get rid of eutils in <EAPI-8, fix eclassdoc, make some funcs internal
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:03:49
Message-Id: CACwN4LwBX7zAYMGyMeFUxMVZtmRZUS+nS2qptDA08=OQ8zOa0Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] flag-o-matic.eclass: get rid of eutils in by Sergei Trofimovich
1 I'm curious - why the split e.g. test-flag-PROG() and _test-flag-PROG()? Is
2 this stylistic, or does it serve a functional purpose? (Hah, "functional",
3 get it? Because they're functions?!?
4
5 Please excuse any formatting oddness I'm not sure how to make plaintext
6 emails from the gmail android client
7
8 >
9
10 El mié., 31 de marzo de 2021 5:13 a. m., Sergei Trofimovich <
11 slyfox@g.o> escribió:
12
13 > On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:45:52 +0200
14 > Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@g.o> wrote:
15 >
16 > > On Mittwoch, 31. März 2021 09:33:21 CEST Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
17 > > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:39:27 +0200
18 > > > >
19 > > > > See also:
20 > > > > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/eapi-per-eclass/eutils.eclass/
21 > > > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/20207
22 > > >
23 > > > Please post series as separate patches.
24 > > >
25 > >
26 > > They are separate in the linked PR, if you need to check that they are a
27 > > proper series.
28 >
29 > I planned to provide review in this mailing list.
30 >
31 > --
32 >
33 > Sergei
34 >

Replies