Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Ohearn <pat@××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Update: qt-4
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:23:54
Message-Id: 1198160205.20472.0.camel@asmodeus
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Project Update: qt-4 by Caleb Tennis
1 On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 09:05 -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote:
2 > Just a quick update on the happens in the x11-libs/qt world, as I'm introducing some
3 > changes that will probably affect people in the not-to-distant future.
4 >
5 > Since Qt is starting to get rather, ahem, big, I've decided that with the
6 > introduction of version 4.4 it's a good time to try and split it down into more
7 > manageable chunks. I'm introducing a few new packages that are designed to break
8 > out some of the major pieces into their own packages. I present:
9 >
10 > x11-libs/qt
11 > x11-libs/qt-dbus ( Breaking out into its own package )
12 > x11-libs/qt-phonon ( New for 4.4, a wrapper around various sound modules )
13 > x11-libs/qt-qt3support ( Breaking out into its own package )
14 > x11-libs/qt-webkit ( New for 4.4, Qt's integrated WebKit support )
15 >
16 > There may be some more of these as time goes on and necessity/desire dictate.
17 >
18 > The main motivation behind doing this is to make the package a little more
19 > manageable, in that it's not one huge monolithic package with a million use flags
20 > dictating which modules get built. This should make dependant package maintenance
21 > nicer, as you can just depend on the necessary packages and not have to resort to
22 > the built_with_use trickery that we all love so much.
23 >
24 > As well, we gain in the same vein as the split KDE style packages, that updates and
25 > security fixes don't require a recompilation of all of the non-affected modules.
26 >
27 > There are still lots of goodies that need to be tested. I'm sure there are
28 > edge-case USE flag scenarios that may need to be accounted for, performance tweaks
29 > to be made, and other things I haven't thought of. If you're into bleeding edge,
30 > I'd love to have you try out some of these new packages and see if you've got any
31 > failures or ideas for making them better.
32 >
33 > As usual, this stuff is all package.masked right now pending lots of tweaks and
34 > changes in the short term. My guess is that it will hit portage proper by the end
35 > of 1Q2008. Hopefully we can have it all happy by then.
36 >
37 > Feel free to file any bug reports you can find or think of. Patches are especially
38 > encouraged.
39 >
40 > Thanks,
41 > Caleb
42 >
43 How about splitting qmake out to help with the WebKitGtk stuff, so we
44 don't have to dep on qt?
45
46 Or can't this be done as easy as the other parts?
47 --
48 Patrick Ohearn
49 Email: pat@××××.net
50 XMMP: pat@××××.net
51
52 --
53 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Update: qt-4 Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o>