1 |
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 09:05 -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: |
2 |
> Just a quick update on the happens in the x11-libs/qt world, as I'm introducing some |
3 |
> changes that will probably affect people in the not-to-distant future. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Since Qt is starting to get rather, ahem, big, I've decided that with the |
6 |
> introduction of version 4.4 it's a good time to try and split it down into more |
7 |
> manageable chunks. I'm introducing a few new packages that are designed to break |
8 |
> out some of the major pieces into their own packages. I present: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> x11-libs/qt |
11 |
> x11-libs/qt-dbus ( Breaking out into its own package ) |
12 |
> x11-libs/qt-phonon ( New for 4.4, a wrapper around various sound modules ) |
13 |
> x11-libs/qt-qt3support ( Breaking out into its own package ) |
14 |
> x11-libs/qt-webkit ( New for 4.4, Qt's integrated WebKit support ) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> There may be some more of these as time goes on and necessity/desire dictate. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> The main motivation behind doing this is to make the package a little more |
19 |
> manageable, in that it's not one huge monolithic package with a million use flags |
20 |
> dictating which modules get built. This should make dependant package maintenance |
21 |
> nicer, as you can just depend on the necessary packages and not have to resort to |
22 |
> the built_with_use trickery that we all love so much. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> As well, we gain in the same vein as the split KDE style packages, that updates and |
25 |
> security fixes don't require a recompilation of all of the non-affected modules. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> There are still lots of goodies that need to be tested. I'm sure there are |
28 |
> edge-case USE flag scenarios that may need to be accounted for, performance tweaks |
29 |
> to be made, and other things I haven't thought of. If you're into bleeding edge, |
30 |
> I'd love to have you try out some of these new packages and see if you've got any |
31 |
> failures or ideas for making them better. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> As usual, this stuff is all package.masked right now pending lots of tweaks and |
34 |
> changes in the short term. My guess is that it will hit portage proper by the end |
35 |
> of 1Q2008. Hopefully we can have it all happy by then. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Feel free to file any bug reports you can find or think of. Patches are especially |
38 |
> encouraged. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Thanks, |
41 |
> Caleb |
42 |
> |
43 |
How about splitting qmake out to help with the WebKitGtk stuff, so we |
44 |
don't have to dep on qt? |
45 |
|
46 |
Or can't this be done as easy as the other parts? |
47 |
-- |
48 |
Patrick Ohearn |
49 |
Email: pat@××××.net |
50 |
XMMP: pat@××××.net |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |