1 |
--On Wednesday, June 25, 2003 23:08:44 +0900 Stuart Bouyer |
2 |
<stubear@××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
I perfectly understand the complaint you've just made. I don't think it was |
5 |
clear from the previous emails, maybe its just me. |
6 |
|
7 |
> Not only will new versions of |
8 |
> ebuilds have been added to the portage tree, but there is a great chance |
9 |
> that ebuild for the version of the package that I'm happy using will no |
10 |
> longer be in portage tree. What I install using the 1.3 install CD today |
11 |
> will be very different from what I installed 3 months ago. |
12 |
|
13 |
Please don't confuse which install CD you used with which packages you have |
14 |
installed. The two are completely unlrelated unless you have never updated |
15 |
anything from the stage3 build of the CD. |
16 |
|
17 |
I'd like to reiterate that "releases" are only releases of the install CD, |
18 |
not the system. |
19 |
|
20 |
> If I don't want to update to the new package - and there are many |
21 |
> reasons why I would not want to - then my only optinos are not to emerge |
22 |
> sync (and miss out on the update I do need) or to manually find the |
23 |
> ebuilds I want in the attic of the web cvs gateway. |
24 |
|
25 |
Yes and this is a pain. We have no way to fix this currently which is what |
26 |
I meant to imply with my email, I obviously failed miserably, sorry about |
27 |
that. |
28 |
|
29 |
Due to the strain on infrastructure we don't allow users to sync their |
30 |
portage tree using CVS. I can't see a way round this until we have the |
31 |
capacity to allow anonymous CVS access again. Even then it will mean a big |
32 |
change in the way gentoo is developed (use of CVS tags and marking some |
33 |
kind of "system release") and possibly changes to portage. |
34 |
|
35 |
Currently only the live/install CDs are "released" as such. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
|
39 |
robh@g.o / robh:irc.freenode.net |
40 |
http://cvs.gentoo.org/~robh/robh@××××××××××.asc |