1 |
On Sat, 2020-03-28 at 00:15 +0100, Conrad Kostecki wrote: |
2 |
> a longer time ago, there were some concerns about privacy reasons |
3 |
> discussed here. It took a long time, but there is now a new version |
4 |
> released with lot's of changes. Since all results are still by default |
5 |
> uploaded, It should be noted, that hw-probeuploads a 32-byte prefix of |
6 |
> salted SHA512 hash of MAC addresses and serial numbers to properly |
7 |
> identify unique computers and hard drives. Here is one example report of |
8 |
> one of my devices https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=6bc7d86b9c. FWICS, |
9 |
> sensetive informtion seems not to be present. I would like to gather |
10 |
> some opinion about here, if there are any objections about adding |
11 |
> hw-probe to Gentoo. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
If: |
15 |
|
16 |
1. it doesn't do this automatically after installing (i.e. install |
17 |
an enabled cronjob or alike), and |
18 |
|
19 |
2. users are made aware what it does (i.e. because it's obvious that |
20 |
the program's purpose is to upload, or they're warned in postinst), |
21 |
|
22 |
I don't see a problem with it. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Best regards, |
26 |
Michał Górny |