Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:00:11
Message-Id: 4F802C04.5000304@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically by "Paweł Rumian"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 04/07/2012 07:52 AM, Paweł Rumian wrote:
5 > Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>:
6 >
7 >> Thank you for your report. Yes this looks like an issue. If I had
8 >> to choose I'd pick 'vpx' but it seems to me that media-video@
9 >> and mozilla@ teams needs to reach consensus.
10 >
11 > Should I poke them in any way? Reopen and assign the bug to them?
12 >
13 > BR, Paweł Rumian
14 >
15 Yes. Yes.
16
17 I'd vote that the flag name should be 'webm' as that's more readily
18 recognizable than 'vpx'.
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
21 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
22
23 iF4EAREIAAYFAk+ALAQACgkQVxOqA9G7/aBe8gEAj2LSviLEzQasFXmJzjT0oiHp
24 cEuId91yPkkdWH3sZbUA/29RjvgHCA/gCmKIfkq1arV0z7ZbsP11bBezwUoxcW1f
25 =GG+2
26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----