| 1 |
On 18/02/17 20:03, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ühel kenal päeval, L, 18.02.2017 kell 19:47, kirjutas Michał Górny: |
| 3 |
>> commit: 7207a292b2591dde5cbd336470bed3c11617a8e1 |
| 4 |
>> Commit: Michał Górny <mgorny <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 5 |
>> CommitDate: Sat Feb 18 19:47:25 2017 +0000 |
| 6 |
>> URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7207 |
| 7 |
>> a292 |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> dev-util/wxglade: python-single-r1, EAPI=6 |
| 10 |
> While I appreciate work done to do this conversion finally, what was |
| 11 |
> the reason to bypass the maintainers after being explicitly told on IRC |
| 12 |
> to not do so? |
| 13 |
> Since when have we entered a free-for-all state of maintenance in |
| 14 |
> Gentoo? |
| 15 |
> I would like to know the state of affairs, so I know for future |
| 16 |
> reference what can I expect and what I can do to packages that I do not |
| 17 |
> explicitly maintain either. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> And yes, I am aware there was a pending bump request for a couple |
| 20 |
> years. I'm still dealing with backlog after getting back to tree |
| 21 |
> maintenance. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Mart Raudsepp, |
| 25 |
> thoroughly confused about current maintenance policies |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
I would also argue why wasn't this revbumped at the same time, if the |
| 28 |
package was touched -at all-. This is a package I've been interested in |
| 29 |
as a user for a couple of years now, but not having the required |
| 30 |
knowledge, hadn't touched it to update. 0.6.3 is -ancient- and |
| 31 |
unsupported upstream. In fact, I have been instrumental in fixing a few |
| 32 |
bugs in the 0.7-series upstream, but could not bring these releases to |
| 33 |
Gentoo because of the reasons mentioned. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Equally mystified, |
| 36 |
Michael/veremit. |
Archives