1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Should we use this to drop RDEPEND from pkg_*inst/rm phases ? |
4 |
> PMS states "RDEPEND (unless the particular dependency results in a |
5 |
> circular dependency, in which case it may be installed later)" which is |
6 |
> kind of "maybe maybe not" and I'm not sure how one can rely on RDEPEND |
7 |
> for those phases in their ebuilds if another random ebuild can trigger |
8 |
> a case where it's not satisfied. |
9 |
|
10 |
This wording has already been updated in git. It just says "RDEPEND" now |
11 |
for these four phases: |
12 |
|
13 |
https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-720008.1 |
14 |
|
15 |
Ulrich |