Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:30:01
Message-Id: 1088022672.32246.18.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem by Jason Huebel
1 On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 15:57, Jason Huebel wrote:
2 > The keywording policy has always been that a package must remain in "testing"
3 > for at least 30 days without a bug report being filed on it. Our team has
4 > made an effort to move packages into stable as soon as they meet that
5 > criteria. That policy has been very successful over the last year, with a
6 > very small number of exceptions.
7
8 This is all the more reason to make sure that you get the output of
9 "emerge info" when someone files a bug. After all, how many bugs out
10 there have been arch specific, but it took the maintainer a while to
11 figure it out because the submitter wasn't clear?
12
13 --
14 Chris Gianelloni
15 Release Engineering QA Manager/Games Developer
16 Gentoo Linux
17
18 Is your power animal a penguin?

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature