| 1 |
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Ian Whyman <thev00d00@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>>> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's |
| 5 |
>>>> XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage. |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> XML-RPC is shit. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Shame that it requires custom patches to BZ, personally I think the |
| 13 |
> preferable (and offically supported) method would be JSON-RPC[1] |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Ian |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> 1.http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.0/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.html |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Quoting that page: |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Please note that everything about this JSON-RPC interface is |
| 23 |
EXPERIMENTAL. If you want a fully stable API, please use the |
| 24 |
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::XMLRPC|XML-RPC interface. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
This is why I suggested the XML-RPC api. |
Archives