| 1 |
"We intend GLEPs to be the primary mechanisms for proposing |
| 2 |
significant new features, for collecting community input on an issue, |
| 3 |
and for documenting the design decisions that have gone into Gentoo |
| 4 |
Linux." |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I guess instead I should go into CVS and find the original |
| 7 |
justification for this decision, but this doesn't really seem |
| 8 |
appropriate for what I'm talking about... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Ilya, when I said "you can't get above the DocumentRoot" I meant an |
| 11 |
outside accessor cannot go outside it at whim. I think -- since I was |
| 12 |
talking about a design choice that involved access denies and allows |
| 13 |
-- that the context would have made it clear who the figurative and |
| 14 |
deictic "you" referred to. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The configuration -- on Gentoo -- of Apache (by which I mean Apache 2) |
| 17 |
is very different from the default configuration, and very different |
| 18 |
from the configurations in use on most other systems. This creates |
| 19 |
problems for those used to working with non-gentoo systems. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
IMO, unless a quirk has a specific reason, it shouldn't exist. A |
| 22 |
better distribution = fewer surprises. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:09:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> On Friday 04 June 2004 01:45 pm, Josh Ockert wrote: |
| 28 |
> > I'm new here, more of a user than a dev. really but I wanted to ask |
| 29 |
> > about Apache's default configuration -- it took me a few minutes to |
| 30 |
> > realize what was going on, and I was just wondering why Gentoo's |
| 31 |
> > Apache has to be so different from everyone else's. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> goto glep.gentoo.org and read about webapp |
| 34 |
> -mike |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> -- |
| 37 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives