1 |
>>>>> "MG" == Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
MG> Dnia 2014-06-30, o godz. 17:40:16 |
4 |
MG> James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> napisał(a): |
5 |
|
6 |
>> So it should be fine to unmask 5.3 and slowly update reverse |
7 |
>> dependencies to depend on 5.3 instead of whichever 4.x they |
8 |
>> currently demand. |
9 |
|
10 |
>> Unmasking the earlier 5.x releases seems unnecessary, though. |
11 |
|
12 |
MG> While at it, please don't unmask <5.3.28-r1 (EAPI<5 ebuilds). Multilib |
13 |
MG> relies heavily on not having anything EAPI<5 over 4.8.30-r1. |
14 |
|
15 |
Good point. I should have more precise and said "the most recent ebuild |
16 |
in the 5.3 SLOT", which is what I was thinking. |
17 |
|
18 |
-JimC |
19 |
-- |
20 |
-JimC |
21 |
-- |
22 |
James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6 |