| 1 |
Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 07 April 2006 04:26, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I also share the opinion that we shouldn't go against upstream wishes |
| 4 |
>> IRT branding, but if upstream encourages some fairly subtle branding |
| 5 |
>> along with keeping their name visible, I'm for it. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> There's a thread in gentoo-core from 2004 with regards to branding and the |
| 8 |
> outcome was to refrain from it. I don't have a problem, when we do this for |
| 9 |
> live iso's, but generally I strongly dislike it. Users don't choose their |
| 10 |
> distro because of it, so it's just unnecessary bloat. And given that we tout |
| 11 |
> Gentoo a meta distribution, encouraging others to build on it, there's no |
| 12 |
> point forcing them to have to clean out the Gentoo brand, before they |
| 13 |
> actually can use it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
He said he wanted to make it easy, not forcing it. Or am I mistaken? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Kind Regards, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Simon Stelling |
| 21 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives