| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> And by all upgrade paths would that include adding the bad |
| 9 |
>>>> conversion of /etc/modules.autoload.d/ |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>> looks/tested correct to me |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> breaks for anything with a module parameter |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> last i looked module parameters were not allowed. but it's a good thing it's |
| 17 |
> p.masked so we can fix it easily. |
| 18 |
> -mike |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
/etc/modules.autoload.d has always allowed module parameters to appear |
| 21 |
after the module name. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
/etc/conf.d/modules has allowed a completely different syntax requiring |
| 24 |
variables based on the module name to be set with the module parameters. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
This is where Roy and I have been stuck as far as an automatic |
| 27 |
conversion process. The stuff you included in the openrc-9999 ebuild was |
| 28 |
something I had sent to Roy months ago before I realized module |
| 29 |
parameters would be an issue. Looking at a swath of various |
| 30 |
/etc/modules.autoload.d/ files, I haven't come up with shell code that |
| 31 |
does the right thing everytime with all the files, which is why I've |
| 32 |
left it up to being a manual process for the user and simply documenting it. |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives