Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:02:40
Message-Id: 4CC9746B.2020009@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild by Gilles Dartiguelongue
1 On 10/28/2010 03:55 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
2 > Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 12:32 +0000, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a
3 > écrit :
4 >> ssuominen 10/10/28 12:32:21
5 >>
6 >> Modified: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
7 >> Log:
8 >> header
9 >>
10 >> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha1/cvs/Linux x86_64)
11 >>
12 >> Revision Changes Path
13 >> 1.7 net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild
14 >>
15 >> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild?rev=1.7&view=markup
16 >> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild?rev=1.7&content-type=text/plain
17 >> diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
18 >>
19 >> Index: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
20 >> ===================================================================
21 >> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild,v
22 >> retrieving revision 1.6
23 >> retrieving revision 1.7
24 >> diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
25 >> --- blogtk-1.0.ebuild 26 Jul 2008 22:48:58 -0000 1.6
26 >> +++ blogtk-1.0.ebuild 28 Oct 2010 12:32:21 -0000 1.7
27 >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
28 >> -# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation
29 >> +# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
30 >> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
31 >> -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild,v 1.6 2008/07/26 22:48:58 eva Exp $
32 >> +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/blogtk/blogtk-1.0.ebuild,v 1.7 2010/10/28 12:32:21 ssuominen Exp $
33 >>
34 >> inherit eutils
35 >
36 > what's this change for ? blogtk-2 stabilization will come soon anyway...
37 >
38 >
39
40 kind of obvious, isn't it? someone edited the ebuild without updating
41 ebuild header to 2010, repoman bitched about it. :)

Replies