| 1 |
On Tuesday 31 July 2001 03:47, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dan Armak wrote: |
| 3 |
> >Hi all, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >I have taken on myself the management of incoming ebuilds from users |
| 6 |
> > without cvs accounts. The ebuilds will (for now) still be posted here. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >Ebuilds go into /usr/portage/incoming. I will create low-priority, public |
| 9 |
> >unstable dev-wiki notes to the teams involved for each ebuild. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> >Developers should test ebuilds, classify them and move them to their new |
| 12 |
> > home (and delete them from incoming). To keep track of the situation I |
| 13 |
> > suggest that whenever a developer verifies a user ebuild, he should grab |
| 14 |
> > the wiki item (and mark it completed or not as needed). |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> >On the mailing list, I will post std. notes as replies to the ebuilds I |
| 17 |
> > move to /usr/portage/incoming. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Actually, I suggest grabbing the wiki first. Then you will know if |
| 20 |
> someone else has claimed it. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Oh, and by the way Dan, Chad (me, aka Bab5, aka chadh) is a developer now. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Chad (chadh) |
| 25 |
Oh! OK. Glad you've joined us. You'll probably want to grab all your own wiki |
| 26 |
items, then. I didn't look into names, but rather added all ebuilds into |
| 27 |
incoming which weren't in cvs yet. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Dan Armak |
| 32 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team |
| 33 |
Matan, Israel |
Archives