| 1 |
2009/5/17 Thomas de Grenier de Latour <tom.gl@××××.fr>: |
| 2 |
> On 2009/05/17, Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> - Vote on GLEP 54 |
| 5 |
>> This vote was called for by dertobi123. The vote was on |
| 6 |
>> whether to approve GLEP 54 conditional on whether GLEP 55 is passed. |
| 7 |
>> The reason for this is that GLEP 54 is unimplementable without the |
| 8 |
>> problems mentioned in GLEP 55 being solved. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Conclusion: |
| 11 |
>> Conditionally approved on whether GLEP 55 is approved. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Sorry if the question has already been raised (i would be surprised it |
| 15 |
> was not), but... Back in january [1], it was decided that base profile |
| 16 |
> (and thus package.mask) should stay in EAPI=0 syntax. So once you've |
| 17 |
> approved GLEP55 (or an alternative) and introduced an EAPI with support |
| 18 |
> for -scm suffix, how will you package.mask this new-style live ebuilds? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
You set KEYWORDS="". If you need to do something in profiles with it |
| 21 |
you can use profile eapis. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Best Regards, |
| 25 |
Piotr Jaroszyński |
Archives