Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest issues in the tree
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:59:20
Message-Id: 200307171859.19235.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest issues in the tree by Dhruba Bandopadhyay
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Thursday 17 July 2003 05:40, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
5 > Tavis Ormandy wrote:
6 > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:00:48AM +0100, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
7 > >>Is there really a keyword in FEATURES called 'manifest'? It is
8 > >>certainly not documented in make.conf. Where is this declared?
9 > >
10 > > # 'strict' causes portage to react strongly to conditions that
11 > > # have the potential to be dangerous -- like missing
12 > > # or incorrect Manifest files.
13 >
14 > That is 'strict'. I was asking about 'manifest'.
15
16 the manifest FEATURE is a fleeting one ...
17 that is to say it isnt documented because it isnt going to exist for long ...
18 forget about it, go home, kiss your loved ones, and get a good nites sleep.
19 - -mike
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
22
23 iQIVAwUBPxcqRkFjO5/oN/WBAQLxqA//TXy7pqIwpKb9I7oTt8ZZK6h5if0QfluU
24 qWq0E1Wmro+fRbsNP/S/BjBFIBGVivwBW3JaG8N9dRDh9fsUQno6TfFKoQQM9J8T
25 pLoKmp/A4ggEm0Rdk9PpmCio24QJ6zhga1i1tuJsnvUy00W1OmcMZLdGko5yf5nc
26 ICYa9yCVjiv6Z92unGiSlLhMl8XAuAjBIg/zWn1d9dO4Gj2I7xf3LBe2zwgrT44B
27 h30RYSYL7Qaza1Xk+7kNsbnD6gdqvnIxQ+vxeylETAB0BpplCrKHCbbQNhIm8Z6n
28 7nsmOX1rfKX6olG5Z83hbF2STCfuIr5fTacXIH2SDuZD2OgRuNB0deXXpdulQ/FG
29 US/mnnJcZ3xgPal5NbIFylXFqNpkRTq11kBWX8r4bsaUs7Lm3I+qm1z7AtaKu1nl
30 g6t28t9kB9ypW8BR+zJZwDH85h2i+GNn40a1AeWxhE3hzePSIr2NXM/ap20DX5cA
31 8TWnWWt87abqwQ8mL+2BS1cpgArIJjOOkkLNYf+0usIcAiFyywmqprspCbRNXs1E
32 UhvOV4h55IKwzyth4Q5skpouuze5pr843JinntQfEK/PH8hWmSNSVwQJ1NBYaCba
33 EMnccGMX0sdYz9txAmrQAAZoNxDXWllDMsn62m8AudA02w4aSJK14xeX9M84Uyvl
34 tZW11nLoBMA=
35 =Htqh
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
37
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list