Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ImageMagick[opencl] sandbox access violations
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:03:07
Message-Id: 5333E814.9000409@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ImageMagick[opencl] sandbox access violations by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 btw, this is http://bugs.gentoo.org/472766
2
3 i'll look into adding a sandbox.d file...
4
5
6 On 27/03/14 10:54, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
7 > There's a sandbox.d configuration directory on purpose;
8 > imagemagick[opencl] should probably install its own exception.
9 >
10 > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
11 > flameeyes@×××××××××.eu <mailto:flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> —
12 > http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
13 >
14 >
15 > On 27 March 2014 07:29, Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@g.o
16 > <mailto:maksbotan@g.o>> wrote:
17 >
18 > Hello,
19 > Currently there are four open bugs (see comment 2 in bug 490457)
20 > about imagemagick tools causing access violations while trying to
21 > open GPU. There is working
22 > solution: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/x11-themes/tango-icon-theme/tango-icon-theme-0.8.90.ebuild?r1=1.15&r2=1.16
23 > This must be applied to all affected ebuilds, so maybe we should
24 > move this code to some eclass (eutils?) so that ebuilds can just
25 > call the function instead of copying the code?
26 >
27 > Maxim.
28 >
29 >