| 1 |
On 08/29/11 13:33, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:23, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Which Zope team is that? Would that be you? Having an overlay with |
| 4 |
>> updated packages certainly sounds good, but it would be nice to have |
| 5 |
>> some indication of what we're waiting for, or how long we're waiting. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Arfrever, it would be nice if you could answer these questions. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If there's no answer, we should just go ahead and last-rite the entire category. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> BTW, what are the mechanics WRT removing an entire category? Should we |
| 12 |
> keep the category around for the benefit of overlays, or are there |
| 13 |
> mechanisms in place so that overlays can setup their own categories? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Overlays can easily define their own categories if needed, so pruning |
| 16 |
the whole directory should not be a problem. Only profiles/categories |
| 17 |
might need to be adapted. |
Archives