1 |
Tach Jeroen, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) |
2 |
|
3 |
Jeroen Roovers schrieb: |
4 |
> I propose the `emerge --info` included in arch testers' comments on |
5 |
> stabilisation bugs should rather be posted as attachments. The AT |
6 |
> comments clog up the bugs and are usually not interesting at all to devs |
7 |
> other than those who are arch devs for the relevant arches. It would |
8 |
> certainly improve my RSI not to have to scroll past them. |
9 |
|
10 |
And when there is a problem, attachments have to be opened...some more |
11 |
steps, especially when there have been a dozen testers and their info has |
12 |
to be filtered out of the attachment list. |
13 |
|
14 |
> On a minor note, I'd also like to see bug reporters use canonical |
15 |
> package names in bug descriptions, including the category (and |
16 |
> preferably the specific version, not some >=foo-3*!!!one, not to mention |
17 |
> specifying no version at all). Including the category means arch devs |
18 |
> won't need to guess/discover which of a few hundred categories a package |
19 |
> is meant to reside in. |
20 |
|
21 |
Seconded. |
22 |
|
23 |
V-Li |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3 |
27 |
http://www.gnupg.org/ |