| 1 |
Am Mittwoch, 1. November 2017, 09:44:09 CET schrieb Michał Górny: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Ok, so before we get into this deeper, here's another option we've been |
| 5 |
> discussing. Let's drop the non-strict mode entirely, drop OPTIONAL |
| 6 |
> and keep MISC as deprecated-used-to-have-special-meaning alias to DATA. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> This is going to make a lot of things simpler, and avoid having the very |
| 9 |
> long discussion on what should be MISC and what not. Especially given |
| 10 |
> that the specific definition of MISC makes little sense as-is. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+1 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
(unless someone comes up with an extremely good usecase that goes beyond user |
| 16 |
configuration) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 20 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives