Archives
Archives
| From: | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:40:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | ersafu$aab$1@sea.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree? by Samuli Suominen |
||
| 1 | Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 | > What do YOU think about removing these from tree? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | *I* think it's a great idea, but *I* may be heavily medicated at the moment. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Seriously, IMHO the less we have depending on GTK+-1 the better. Others |
| 7 | will disagree loudly. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > Related picture, |
| 10 | > http://www.acc.umu.se/~zqad/cats/?view=1163919784-cat-detonator.jpg |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Oh noes! |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | by design, by neglect |
| 17 | dirtyepic gentoo org for a fact or just for effect |
| 18 | 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree? | Andrej Kacian <ticho@g.o> |
