| 1 |
> Yeah, lets wait for Greg or Tianon to reply and if docker+lxc works for |
| 2 |
> them we can unmask lxc. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I've just tested against app-emulation/lxc-1.0.4 and |
| 5 |
app-emulation/docker is functioning properly with the "lxc" use flag |
| 6 |
enabled and the "lxc" exec-driver in use. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Just so I can make sure to take this learning experience to its |
| 9 |
fullest, would an appropriate fix from our end have been to put a USE |
| 10 |
mask on the "lxc" use flag of our package so that the dep was masked |
| 11 |
instead of the whole package? I want to do my part to help avoid this |
| 12 |
problem in the future, since I'm clearly new. O:) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
♥, |
| 15 |
- Tianon |
Archives