Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:10:55
Message-Id: 200506301705.26143.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass by Caleb Tennis
1 On Thursday 30 June 2005 04:42 pm, Caleb Tennis wrote:
2 > On Thursday 30 June 2005 03:36 pm, Aron Griffis wrote:
3 > > See the problem? It didn't exit. That's what will happen if
4 > > a function in DEPEND fails: nothing. Except that yours will currently
5 > > stick this in DEPEND:
6 > >
7 > > !!! error: qt_min_version called with invalid parameter: \"$1\",
8 > > please report bug
9 >
10 > No doubt, it's definitely a hack. However, the only alternative that I can
11 > see is to rename the package (which I'm not opposed to doing). That is,
12 > leave qt3 as "qt" and make qt4 "qt4".
13
14 i'd prefer to not split QT into sep packages
15 -mike
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list