| 1 |
Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 07 September 2006 16:42, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 3 |
>> "!<app-text/hunspell-1.0", which means that you can't have <hunspell-1.0 |
| 4 |
>> and kdelibs installed on a system at the same time. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> This is clear to me. My point was, if there's a specific need to allow to not |
| 7 |
> to break arch keywording this way. I'd find it more foolproof and consistent, |
| 8 |
> if repoman would catch this and Portage would warn. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Warn about what exactly? About blocker that $arch doesn't have even |
| 11 |
keyworded? I fail too see why this would be useful. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Best regards, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Jakub Moc |
| 19 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 20 |
GPG signature: |
| 21 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 22 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives