Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Martin <slarti@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Duncan Coutts (dcoutts)
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 08:53:26
Message-Id: 20050507085329.GA21799@pohl.lj.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Duncan Coutts (dcoutts) by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:53:47AM -0700, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > Tom Martin posted <20050506222301.GA4758@×××××××.net>, excerpted below,
3 > on Fri, 06 May 2005 23:23:01 +0100:
4 >
5 > > I have the pleasure to tell you all about another new developer. His
6 > > name is Duncan Coutts, and he lives in Oxford
7 > >
8 > > Please show Duncan a warm welcome.
9 >
10 > Hi, dcoutts. Another Duncan! =8^)
11 >
12 > I'm not a Gentoo dev (yet?), but I /am/ a regular on the list, and use
13 > "Duncan" both here and on bugzilla as 1i5t5.duncan@×××.net, tho the 1i5t5
14 > can change when the address starts getting to much spam, and of course
15 > the domain can change. A namespace clash agreement might be beneficial. <g>
16 >
17 > If you have no strong preference, dcoutts would maintain the distinction.
18 > I have a preference, but you are the developer while I'm just a user, so
19 > if you prefer "Duncan", I'll look for something else. (FWIW, Duncan is my
20 > surname, but "John" is my first name, and I always put it this way..
21 > There's always too many johns around -- unless you need one. <g> Thus,
22 > I've used Duncan both in meatspace and on the net for a number of years.
23 > Surprisingly, perhaps, just plain "Duncan" has clashed less than John
24 > Duncan or jduncan did. Maybe I should now be "Freedomware Duncan"? <g>)
25
26 Hehe, the convention is just to use your full name :) No possible
27 confusion.
28
29 Tom
30
31 --
32 Tom Martin, http://dev.gentoo.org/~slarti
33
34 AMD64, net-mail, shell-tools, recruiters, vim
35 Gentoo Linux