Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeffrey Forman <jforman@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:30:15
Message-Id: 1116340220.8403.2.camel@buckhead.formanonline.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org by Alin Dobre
1 I've looked at the actual DB behind bugzilla, and that seems to be the
2 only bug having that such situation, with a resolved-like status, but no
3 resolution, all the other bugs look fine. *shrug*
4
5 -Jeffrey
6
7 On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 17:05 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote:
8 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
9 > Hash: SHA1
10 >
11 >
12 > Jonathan Smith wrote:
13 > > Georgi Georgiev wrote:
14 > >
15 > >>>maillog: 17/05/2005-16:04:20(+0300): Alin Dobre types
16 > >>>
17 > >>>>>*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12745 ***
18 > >>>>
19 > >>>>Here it is, the last row.
20 > >>>
21 > >>>
22 > >>>But in the headers it says:
23 > >>>
24 > >>>Status: RESOLVED
25 > >>>Resolution:
26 > >>>
27 > >
28 > >
29 > > right. what i was saying was that it is very nice to see the reason for
30 > > resolution in the summary section.
31 >
32 > something like this:
33 >
34 > What |Removed |Added
35 > -
36 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
37 > Status|NEW |RESOLVED
38 > Resolution| |DUPLICATE
39 >
40 > yes, indeed, the Resolution is empty, now.
41
42 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
43
44 --
45 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org Jonathan Smith <masterdebater@×××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o>