| 1 |
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:53:29PM -0400, Travis Tilley wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Do we have a plan to deprecate devfs or do we plan to support both udev and |
| 3 |
> > devfs indefinitely? If we can get some agreement on how profiles should |
| 4 |
> > be handled in the future (referencing our previous thread on static |
| 5 |
> > profiles and things like GLEP19), I think it would make sense to |
| 6 |
> > standardize on udev going forward. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> please dont force udev on me... i refuse to use that crap. :| |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I welcome constructive criticism all the time. This was not it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
If you have _any_ issues with udev, please let the developers and the |
| 13 |
linux-hotplug-devel mailing list know about it. Otherwise it will not |
| 14 |
get fixed, and you will never be happy. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Oh, and that reminds me to go make up a "delete devfs" kernel patch to |
| 17 |
send off to lkml, just to force the issue :) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
thanks, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
greg k-h |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives