1 |
Serkan Kaba <serkan@g.o> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I think, resolving as UPSTREAM might be more logical as we can't force |
4 |
> every upstream to fix their *borked* build system and the bug will be |
5 |
> left open forever. |
6 |
|
7 |
If upstream refuses to fix an issue that _is an issue_ we have to fix |
8 |
it, not work it around forever and ever. |
9 |
|
10 |
RESO UPSTREAM is good for crashes that are left to upstream, but since |
11 |
Gentoo si abuilt building, build problems needs to get fixed. |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
15 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |