1 |
From time to time cases like the following are brought up to |
2 |
licenses@g.o, for a package that is labelled with |
3 |
LICENSE="as-is": |
4 |
|
5 |
| Permission to use, copy, modify and/or distribute this software in |
6 |
| both binary and source form, for non-commercial purposes, is hereby |
7 |
| granted [...] |
8 |
|
9 |
This is clearly not free/open-source software because of the |
10 |
non-commercial restriction. |
11 |
|
12 |
In my understanding, our "as-is" really is what opensource.org lists |
13 |
as "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer" [1]. Obviously it's |
14 |
very permissive (comparable to MIT or BSD-2). It is also included in |
15 |
our @OSI-APPROVED license group. |
16 |
|
17 |
So, either we should only mark free software with the as-is label. |
18 |
Then it might help if the text was clarified as in the patch below. |
19 |
|
20 |
Or we continue marking random non-free stuff with as-is. Then we |
21 |
should IMHO remove as-is from our free license groups, create a |
22 |
licenses/HPND file (text as in [1]), and move the free packages to it. |
23 |
|
24 |
Currently, 679 packages have as-is in their LICENSE. |
25 |
|
26 |
Ulrich |
27 |
|
28 |
[1] <http://opensource.org/licenses/HPND> |
29 |
|
30 |
--- as-is 12 Jan 2012 19:03:23 -0000 1.3 |
31 |
+++ as-is 23 Sep 2012 09:43:19 -0000 |
32 |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ |
33 |
-This is a generic place holder for a class of licenses that boil down to do |
34 |
-no guarantees and all you get is what you have. The language is usually |
35 |
+This is a generic place holder for a class of licenses that allow you to |
36 |
+do most anything you want with the software. The language is usually |
37 |
similar to: |
38 |
|
39 |
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its |
40 |
@@ -12,13 +12,11 @@ |
41 |
suitability of this software for any purpose. It is provided "as is" |
42 |
without express or implied warranty. |
43 |
|
44 |
- |
45 |
-You will need to check the license that came with the software for the exact |
46 |
-specifics. Generally you are free to do most anything you want with "as is" |
47 |
-software but you should not take this license as legal advice. |
48 |
+You will need to check the license that came with the software (usually as |
49 |
+permission notice in the source files themselves) for the exact wording. |
50 |
|
51 |
Note: Most all license have an "as is" clause. For our purposes this does |
52 |
-not make all software in this category. This category is for software with |
53 |
-very little restrictions. |
54 |
+not make all software in this category. This category is for software that |
55 |
+complies with the Open Source Definition and has very little restrictions. |
56 |
|
57 |
The information in this license about licenses is presented "as is". :-P |