1 |
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 21:39 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> ATs should basically be treated as staff. This includes the following changes |
4 |
> to the current situation: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> - Get a @gentoo.org email address |
7 |
|
8 |
Personally think this might only be fair. |
9 |
|
10 |
> - Get read-only access to the gentoo-x86 repository |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
Can understand the reasoning for this ... we have acl's, etc to make |
14 |
this possible? |
15 |
|
16 |
> Additionally, the mentoring period should be shortened to two weeks if an AT |
17 |
> wants to take the end quiz to become a developer, assuming he has been AT for |
18 |
> at least two weeks. Users which want to become developers should also run |
19 |
> through the process of an AT. The amd64 porting team has handled situations |
20 |
> like this for a while and only made positive experiences. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Not too familiar on this, so i guess its going to depend on how thorough |
24 |
the planned (new?) AT tests are. |
25 |
|
26 |
> Also, the idea of an arch tester as a trustful user who is able to test |
27 |
> critical changes (such as hard masked software branches), should be expanded |
28 |
> to every herd. These 'ATs' wouldn't be called arch testers as the 'arch' is |
29 |
> irritating, instead, herd tester (HT) could be used. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> As arch testers (and herd testers) become official staff, they should be |
32 |
> handled by DevRel. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Backwards Compatibility |
36 |
> ======================= |
37 |
> |
38 |
> All current arch testers should be migrated to staff. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Copyright |
42 |
> ========= |
43 |
> |
44 |
> This document has been placed in the public domain. |
45 |
> |
46 |
-- |
47 |
Martin Schlemmer |