| 1 |
On Sunday 28 December 2003 03:32, Spider wrote: |
| 2 |
> begin quote |
| 3 |
> On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 20:22:53 -0500 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Saturday 27 December 2003 19:24, Spider wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > Oh yes! even more. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > Can people who feel like it take a look for all builds that contain |
| 10 |
> > > the |
| 11 |
> > > word "newdepend" and think at least twice? remember.. newdepend |
| 12 |
> > > means that RDEPEND won't be set (unless you do newrdepend) which |
| 13 |
> > > means that the package will be broken in GRP situations. |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > (Yep, its a known fact that all of KDE is broken and unless fixed |
| 16 |
> > > cannot be reliably distributed on our next release.) |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > the newXdepend's should only be used in eclasses |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Even worse, there are ~300 ebuilds in the tree that uses them. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
It might have been an idea for that the people changing the semantics would |
| 23 |
also have announced the need for a fix. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Paul |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 29 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 30 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 31 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives