| 1 |
On Friday 25 June 2004 07:22 pm, Sven Köhler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> i don't want to submit a bug-report for every this and that, but i've |
| 5 |
> got to say, that i miss virtuals vor the different libcstdc++ versions. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> For example there are the gcc3.2/3.3 ebuilds, and the libstdc++-ebuild |
| 8 |
> that supply the same libstdc++ versions. The virtuals will only be used |
| 9 |
> by precompiled-stuff, but i think it's still necessary. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
oh dear god no... i am not in any way searching and hunting for every single |
| 12 |
binary ebuild in the tree to update it's dependencies (after determining if |
| 13 |
it's c++, non-static, and linked against an older libstdc++). the |
| 14 |
libstdc++-v3 ebuild will be added to the gcc 3.4 profile for any arch with |
| 15 |
binary packages that might need it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
what problem do you want to solve using a virtual? or why would you want a |
| 18 |
virtual? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Travis Tilley <lv@g.o> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives