| 1 |
On 6/7/20 9:14 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Glad to read your offer. Yes, please do so. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I think it would hurt the Gentoo project if single developers delete |
| 6 |
> projects |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> - without without informing the project members |
| 9 |
> - without prior discussion (on gentoo-dev for example), |
| 10 |
> - without vote/consent |
| 11 |
> - without an organized shutdown (reassign bugs, archive things...). |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> However we should continue to find a general solution for the problems |
| 14 |
> discussed in this thread and find a general consent. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Thank you. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
The "voting" and "discussion" happened in #gentoo-dev IRC channel. Every |
| 19 |
participant was unhappy with the state of graphics project, and even |
| 20 |
after pinging the project, no members responded. This "discussion" has |
| 21 |
been ongoing for a while now. While I agree the outcome wasn't clean, in |
| 22 |
my eyes attempts to contact project has been made. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Now for the future, I wouldn't mind having a "last rite: XYV Project" or |
| 25 |
similar e-mail sent to gentoo-dev{-announce} before action to ebuilds is |
| 26 |
taken, so the project members/lead has one final chance to stop it. |
| 27 |
Maybe this even encourages us to go through some of the more inactive |
| 28 |
projects currently? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- juippis |
Archives