Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:43:17
Message-Id: robbat2-20130711T034121-226947194Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014 by "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina"
1 On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:36:44PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
2 > On 07/10/2013 10:03 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
3 > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:27:46PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
4 > >> The other thing we needed to do was completely remove the use of
5 > >> or building of binpkgs during the update_seed stage. Portage has
6 > >> no capability to check binpkg linking to ensure the binpkg was
7 > >> properly usable.
8 > > Can somebody actually please implement this, to run before the
9 > > binpkg merge phase?
10 > Please be more specific, this is currently implemented...
11 I was partially responding to dolsen's comment that it wasn't capable,
12 as well as a discussion I had with somebody on the ChromeOS team a few
13 months ago.
14
15 In the ChromeOS case, if a library was removed off the system, but
16 Portage still thought it was there, and you went to install a binpkg
17 that had an ELF dependency on the removed library, you'd have broken
18 binaries on the system.
19
20 --
21 Robin Hugh Johnson
22 Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
23 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
24 GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85

Replies