Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com>
To: Stefan Schweizer <sschweizer@×××××.com>
Cc: Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o, devil@××××××××××.ua
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] regarding app-rox (attempt n. 2)
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:07:44
Message-Id: 921ad39e04112507077ce6e649@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] regarding app-rox (attempt n. 2) by Stefan Schweizer
1 On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:05:22 +0100, Stefan Schweizer
2 <sschweizer@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:02:54 -0500, Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com> wrote:
4 > > I suppose what you want then is rox-base and possibly rox-extra or
5 > > maybe rox-misc (like kde-misc).
6 >
7 > That makes 3 categories for a little bit more than 20 apps.
8 >
9 Who said 3? -- I'm just saying take the common naming scheme. 1 will
10 be enough, another one can be added later.
11
12 gnustep-base # ls | wc -l
13 7
14
15 xfce-base # ls | wc -l
16 15
17
18 He said around 20 ebuilds so makes perfect sense to have a rox-base
19
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] regarding app-rox (attempt n. 2) Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com>